Web Apps Gone Wild (by going offline)

Thursday, 31 May 2007 17:11 by Admin

Google's announcement of Google Gears is getting a lot of attention around the blogosphere today.  I don't need to rehash what the technology delivers.  You can get Scott Hanselman's take on it here and follow the links on his post for more information.

However, I was reading a post by Lazycoder that calls into question whether having online apps go offline is all that cool or useful:

See, taking a web application offline isn’t as neat as it sounds. Why would I want to work with my document using Google docs offline when I could just edit it using MS Word and upload it later? Why would I want to use Google Reader offline when I have NetNewsWire or RSS Bandit? If I’m going to work with data offline, I sure don’t want to use a browser interface. I want something that’s snappier, richer, and mo’ better. I want a desktop application.

I wanted to leave feedback on his blog, but comments were disabled, so here is my forum. 

I can see that point of view, but for my personal situation, having web apps available offline would be very useful. 

Let's consider Google reader first, since I have a stronger use there.  I use reader because I find myself at multiple computers each day,so I don't want to be tethered to a single machine just to be able to view my news feeds.  However, since I use my laptop frequently and since I occasionally find myself in places with no Internet access, the offline capabilities of reader would be handy.

Same goes for Writely docs/spreadsheets.  Granted, I have used Writely only for simple tasks and it has a long way to go to catch up to MS Office.  However, most of the things I do with docs/spreadsheets are simple tasks, so I find Writely handles almost everything I need to do.  And, if I can access them offline without having to buy a license for office and get plugins, perfect!

Since I am online 99% of the time I am at a computer (including my laptop), I find myself using desktop solutions a lot less than I used to.  If a web app gets the job done and now can be available the 1% of the time I am without Internet access, it is yet a more compelling reason to use them over their desktop counterparts.

As far as desktop apps having a snappier, richer interface, that gap is narrowing.  I find Google Reader's interface to be superb.  The keyboard shortcuts allow me to navigate quickly and the Ajax functions built in gives it a nice feel.  Once Adobe Flex and MS Silverlight get more exposure and more developers become familiar with their capabilities, that gap could close even further.

Technorati tags: , , ,

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Categories:  
Actions:   E-mail | Permalink | Comments (3) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed

Comments

May 31. 2007 18:16

Unresolvable

"but comments were disabled, so here is my forum."
That's strange? I used MarsEdit to post that article. I bet they set "disable comments" as the default during one of their upgrades. Apologies for that. Now, on to reading your post.

Unresolvable

May 31. 2007 18:36

Unresolvable

I use Google Reader as my feed reader primarily. Only because I use an Apple laptop at home but have a Windows desktop at work. That's the main reason for me to use web based applications. Instant cross-platform use. 99% of the time I'm on a computer, I'm connected to the internet. So there's really no reason to take a web app offline.

Local storage of data that a desktop application can access when I'm offline...now you're talking. Local storage of sensitive data, credit cards, passwords, etc... even better.

Unresolvable

May 31. 2007 20:27

Unresolvable

I agree totally about sensitive data and web apps.

It's going to be interesting watching what happens in the next few years. Web apps and desktop apps seem to be converging. Maybe we won't even have this discussion in 5 years anymore.

Unresolvable

Comments are closed